August 26, 2021

Research Paper Published by Agricultural Research Journal on Effectiveness of two diatomaceous earths (FossilShield® and SilicoSec®) against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky | IJAAR

 

Source: Wikipidea.org

InternationalJournal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research – IJAAR published an articles entitled “Effectiveness of two diatomaceous earths (FossilShield® and SilicoSec®) against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infesting two maize varieties (CLH103 and SHABA) at storage” under the volume 8, issue 5. This research work developed by Fotso Tagne Gabriel and Nukenine Elias Nchiwan from Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon. Tofel Haman Katamssadan from the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bamenda, Cameroon. and Adler Cornel from the Julius Kühn-Institut, Institue for Ecological Chemistry, Plant Analysis and Stored Products Protection, Königin-Luise Str.19, D-14195 Berlin, Germany.

Effectiveness of two diatomaceous earths (FossilShield® and SilicoSec®) against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infesting two maize varieties (CLH103 and SHABA) at storage

Abstract

Influence of maize varieties CLH103 and SHABA on the effectiveness of FossilShield® and SilicoSec® against Sitophilus zeamais was evaluated in laboratory. Each product was used at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 g/kg and four exposure periods (1, 3, 7 and 14 days) for adult mortality and F1 progeny production. Damaged and germinated seeds were also assessed. Malathion (positive control) was used at the recommended dosage (0.5 g/kg).

Probit analysis showed that FossilShield® and SilicoSec® were more toxic to weevils on CLH103 than SHABA from 3 days post-infestation, while within 1 day post-infestation, the two products were rather more toxic on SHABA than CLH103. Student t-test showed significant difference between the two maize varieties treated with FossilShield® in the reduction of adult emergence at 1 g/kg while with SilicoSec® this difference was observed for all concentrations. Malathion as positive control completely inhibited the development of insects on the two maize varieties. Like Malathion at the single dosage (0.5 g/kg), the number of emerged insects was completely reduced by each diatomaceous earth (DE) at 2 g/kg. FossilShield® (from 1.5 g/kg) reduced completely grain damages in the CLH103 variety, while FossilShield® (2 g/kg) almost reduced grain damages (1.0%). SilicoSec® achieved complete reduction on CLH103 variety, while, on SHABA variety, the reduction of grain damage was significantly different (7.4%). Seed germination was not affect by the DEs. In this study, the results showed that utilization of FossilShield® and SilicoSec® could be favorably considered as alternative solution to Malathion against Sitophilus zeamais. 

Publisher Name: INNSPUB





Discussion

In this study, the mortality of Sitophiluszeamais caused individually by FossilShield® and SilicoSec® on the two maize varieties was significantly high compared to the untreated control. This mortality increased with concentrations and days of exposure. Similar results were obtained by a number of previous studies on different beetles exposed to different DE formulations (Ceruti et al., 2008; Matti and Awaknavar, 2009; Nukenine et al., 2010; Athanassiou et al., 2011; Shams et al., 2011; Khakame et al., 2012; Chiriloaie et al., 2014; Shafighi et al., 2014). The work done by these authors showed the increased mortality of beetles with increased days of exposure. For each DE formulation used in the present study, mortality of S. zeamais did not exceed 10% with the two maize varieties within 1 day of exposure. But with increased concentration and exposure periods, this mortality was total at higher for the two maize varieties. The insecticidal efficacy of DE is determined by its degree of adherence to the kernel, a physical characteristic of each type of grain (Korunic, 1997, 1998). Athanassiou et al. (2005) and Nukenine et al. (2010) reported similar results with SilicoSec® on stored wheat against of S. oryzae (L.) and on maize against S. zeamais respectively. Since DE acts as a desiccant; when DE particles are picked up by the insect cuticle, the epicuticular layer is destroyed, resulting in death through water loss (Korunic, 1998; Subramanyam and Roesli, 2000). This might explain the highest mortality of weevil at the highest concentration of each DE in this study because active compound increase with the increased concentration so the insect picks up more DE particles in the highest concentration. In our study, the difference on the percentage of reduction in F1 emergence were observed on both maize varieties treated with each DE formulation according to the t-test of Student. Additionally, regardless of the initial number of adults exposed to treated maize, percentage of progeny reduction in treatment, compared to control, was higher for the two maize varieties treated with each DE in all exposure periods (1, 3, 7 and 14). FossilShield® and SilicoSec® were more effective on CLH103 (total reduction from 1.5 g/kg). This could be due to the total mortality of parents in the mortality test at these concentrations. Effective control of protectants is qualified as mortality of adult and/or immature, confirmed by lack of progeny generation (Hertlein et al., 2011). On the other hand, on SHABA treated with each DE formulation, the percentage reduction in adult emergence was not total even at 2 g/kg. this could be due to the higher level of grain moisture content (13.20%) which is one of the most important factors influencing efficacy of DE in pest control products (Khakame et al., 2012). Our results agree with those of Mewis and Ulrichs (2001) who did not recorded total suppression progeny emergence of S. granaries, insect of the same family as S. zeamais exposed to FossilShield® despite the total mortality recorded. Seed damaged was significantly reduced for the two maize varieties treated with each diatomaceous earth after four months of storage. Matti and Awaknavar (2009) observed no percentage of seed damage in the sorghum treated with Protect-It at the dosage of 0.1 g. The studies of the previous authors agree with ours in the case of CLH103 variety treated with both DEs which recorded no percentage of seed damage at the concentration of 2 g/kg. In the SHABA variety, damage observed on grains may be attributed to the increase of population. Furthermore, the grains moisture content is one of the most important factors affecting efficacy of DE in pest control products (Khakame et al., 2012). The moisture content of the two maize varieties used here were respectively 11.30% and 13.20% for CLH103 and SHABA under the ambient laboratory conditions (t ≈ 22.6-25.6°C; r.h. ≈ 70.7-80%). For that reason, the higher moisture content of SHABA variety compared to CLH103 may decrease the efficacy of DEs and permitted the development of S. zeamais (Snelson, 1987; Afridi et al., 2001). In additional to reduce seed damages, since the mode of action of DE dusts is the desiccation, lower grain moisture content also increased their efficacy (Fields and Korunic, 2000). Khakame et al. (2012) observed in their study that when moisture content increased from 10 to 16%, the progeny emerged in grain treated with Actellic Super® dust increased from 0 to 0.5 compared to the untreated grain. Generally seed viability was not affected by each DE. Matti and Awaknavar (2009) reported that Protect-it did not have negative effects on seed germination even exposed at different temperature and relative humidity. Also Nukenine et al. (2010) recorded percentage of germination of maize treated with SilicoSec® ranged between 66.7-70.0%. Our results suggest that the viability of the two maize varieties was not affected by each DE. However, the percentage of seed germination varies according the maize variety. Akob and Ewete (2007) observed that E. grandis ash at 2 g/2kg of maize protected grains for 6 months without any adverse effect on seeds germination. According to Couturon (1980), when environmental conditions are not well controlled, germination rate decreases quickly. That could partly explain the loss of viability. Get the full Articles by following the link Int. J. Agr. Agri. Res. 8(5), 1-13, May 2016.



0 comments: